SAP Certified - Database Administrator - SAP HANA : C_DBADM_2601

CHALLENGE 3 - Cloud Readiness Evidence Separation
The modernization lead wants the SAP HANA Cloud database included in the same readiness status as the on-premises SIT systems because the cloud database is provisioned. The cloud environment has only limited test data and no complete monitoring or recovery evidence package. What is the best response?

• A. Use the upgraded on-premises system's monitoring evidence as the cloud readiness record.
• B. Include the cloud database in the same readiness status because provisioning confirms the environment exists.
• C. Exclude SAP HANA Cloud from all planning until every on-premises SIT cycle is finished.
• D. Keep cloud readiness separate until cloud-specific administration evidence is completed.

A regional print services company is rehearsing a phased migration from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The export completes, the target database is reachable, and database explorer confirms that sample queries return dat a. During review, the administrator finds that the rehearsal workbook does not include a comparison of administration checks between the source system before export and the cloud target after import. The project lead wants approval because the query results are correct.
The constraint is that the migration wave must prove operational transition readiness, not only data access. The validation pattern must show that source administration evidence and target administration evidence were captured at the correct points in the migration sequence.
Which recommendation is most appropriate?

• A. Approve the rehearsal because successful target queries prove that the migrated data is usable.
• B. Capture source pre-export administration evidence and target post-import administration evidence, then approve only after both are validated.
• C. Defer administration comparison until production cutover so the rehearsal can focus only on transfer completion.
• D. Repeat the source export because missing administration comparison means the data movement failed.

A consumer goods company runs SAP HANA for daily operational dashboards in a mixed landscape. The database remains available, but SAP HANA cockpit shows repeated alert notifications for disk usage growth in a data volume. The administrator checks recent workload activity and confirms that dashboard execution still completes successfully. A support analyst proposes acknowledging the alerts because no user-facing outage has occurred.
The constraint is that the administrator must prevent the monitoring artifact from becoming an execution-impacting condition while avoiding unnecessary database restart activity during business hours. The operations manager needs evidence that the alert is being handled at the correct system layer before the next reporting cycle begins.
Which action best addresses the monitoring condition?

• A. Increase the alert threshold so the current warning no longer appears during normal dashboard execution.
• B. Restart the database so disk usage indicators refresh before the next reporting cycle begins.
• C. Acknowledge the alert and wait for user reports because dashboard execution currently completes successfully.
• D. Investigate volume growth and related workload activity, correct the capacity condition, and validate that the alert state clears.

CHALLENGE 1 - UAT Configuration Evidence Reconciliation
During UAT preparation, test users can open activation backlog reports from both SAP HANA systems. The newly installed UAT database has its active configuration documented, but the upgraded reporting system still has one post-upgrade value recorded only in a release note. What should the administrator do before accepting the UAT comparison?

• A. Remove the documented value from the UAT database record so both systems appear aligned.
• B. Reconcile the release-note value into the upgraded system's current administration record.
• C. Continue UAT and review the release note only if report users identify inconsistent data.
• D. Accept the comparison because both systems return the required reports during UAT.

A regional chemicals distributor is preparing an SAP HANA installation handover for a newly built on-premises administration environment. The installation process completed, and the database starts successfully. During handover review, the administrator finds that the installation record confirms software setup but does not include evidence that backup scheduling and monitoring checks were enabled for the new system. The infrastructure lead wants to accept the environment because startup was successful.
The constraint is that the administrator must confirm the installed system is ready for routine administration before handover. The decision must include post-installation operational controls, not only installation completion.
Which action best supports the handover decision?

• A. Enable and validate the required backup scheduling and monitoring checks, then accept the installation handover only after those controls are confirmed.
• B. Run a second database startup and use the repeated startup result as evidence that administration controls are ready.
• C. Accept the handover because installation completion and successful startup prove the new SAP HANA system is ready.
• D. Defer backup and monitoring setup until business users begin reporting from the new database.